top of page

Imperialism is Trump Legacy:He Wants Canada, Greenland, Panama, and Mexico

Writer's picture: WW
Image by Wix.com
Image by Wix.com

The Historical Context of American Imperialism

American imperialism is a concept that has evolved significantly over more than a century. Historically, the United States has pursued territorial and economic expansion, mirroring the mindset of a mighty eagle soaring beyond its own nest. The late 19th and early 20th centuries marked a period of aggressive expansionism, with the acquisition of territories like Puerto Rico and the Philippines following the Spanish-American War in 1898. This period set a precedent for American involvement in international affairs and established a narrative of being a "liberator" while often disguising imperial ambitions.

In the post-World War II era, this eagle transformed into a hawk, asserting dominance in various regions under the guise of protecting democracy and human rights. The Cold War further solidified this stance, as the U.S. expanded its influence through military and economic means. The doctrine of Manifest Destiny carried into foreign policy, supporting the idea that it was America's duty to export its values across the globe.

Throughout this era, the United States engaged in numerous interventions, often justified by the need to combat communism or promote stability. The Korean War and the Vietnam War are prime examples where the U.S. sought to contain the spread of communism, leading to significant military involvement and controversial policies that affected millions. These actions not only shaped the geopolitical landscape but also sparked intense domestic debates about the morality and effectiveness of American interventionism. Critics argued that such imperialistic pursuits often led to unintended consequences, including long-lasting instability in the regions involved.

Moreover, the economic dimensions of American imperialism cannot be overlooked. The establishment of institutions like the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank in the mid-20th century reflected a commitment to shaping global economic policies that favored American interests. Through these institutions, the U.S. exerted considerable influence over developing nations, often tying financial aid to the adoption of free-market reforms. This economic imperialism has been criticized for perpetuating cycles of dependency and inequality, raising questions about the true nature of American altruism on the world stage.

Analyzing Trump's Foreign Policy Approach

Donald Trump's tenure (2017-2021) introduced a unique approach to foreign relations, which could be likened to a bull in a china shop—often disruptive but undeniably impactful. His "America First" philosophy emphasized a transactional approach towards allies and adversaries alike, prioritizing U.S. interests above global considerations. This approach positioned the U.S. as a self-interested actor, willing to overlook established norms and alliances for the sake of expediency.

Trump's time in office saw an increasing focus on

national sovereignty

and a move away from multilateral agreements that he viewed as detrimental to American interests. Critics argue that this strategy weakened U.S. influence globally and sowed distrust among traditional allies. Nevertheless, proponents contend that this approach reinvigorated a dormant sense of nationalism among Americans, resonating with those who felt overlooked in the globalization narrative.

One of the most significant manifestations of Trump's foreign policy was his handling of trade relations, particularly with China. The imposition of tariffs on Chinese goods marked a departure from previous administrations' strategies, which often favored engagement and cooperation. Trump's administration framed this trade war as a necessary step to rectify what they described as unfair practices by China, including intellectual property theft and currency manipulation. While this aggressive stance aimed to protect American jobs and industries, it also sparked concerns about a potential economic backlash and strained relations with one of the world's largest economies.

Additionally, Trump's approach to international alliances was characterized by a notable skepticism towards organizations such as NATO and the United Nations. He frequently questioned the financial contributions of member countries and suggested that the U.S. was shouldering an unfair burden. This rhetoric not only unsettled long-standing partnerships but also raised questions about the future of collective security arrangements. Supporters of Trump's strategy argued that it forced allies to take greater responsibility for their own defense, while critics warned that it could lead to a fragmented international order, undermining decades of diplomatic efforts aimed at fostering cooperation and stability.

Canada: A Neighbor or a Target?

The relationship between the United States and Canada has often been described as one of the closest partnerships in the world. However, under Trump's leadership, this delicate relationship was put to the test, revealing underlying tensions that could be likened to a simmering pot about to overflow. Trade disputes, particularly concerning tariffs on steel and aluminum, raised questions about the long-term implications of this bond.

In 2018, Trump's administration launched an assault on Canada's trade status, threatening to impose tariffs on Canadian goods. This demonstrated a shift from viewing Canada as a neighbor to contemplating it as a potential target for economic advantage. The negotiation of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) became a central focus, attempting to recalibrate trade dynamics. Yet, Canadians began to question how reliable the U.S. would remain as an ally, given the unpredictability of Trump's tactics.

Greenland: Strategic Interests and Controversies

Greenland, the world's largest island, emerged as a focal point of contention during Trump's presidency when he expressed an interest in purchasing the territory from Denmark—prompting both intrigue and outrage. This desire exemplified Trump's unconventional approach, driven by strategic interests and a broader vision of American dominance. In a way, Trump's interest in Greenland can be likened to an architect who seeks to expand his blueprint by annexing an intriguing piece of land.

The geopolitical significance of Greenland cannot be understated, as its location presents advantages for military and resource exploration amidst climate change. The natural riches embedded within Greenland's ice—strategically important minerals and oil reserves—attracted Trump's attention. However, Denmark’s firm rejection of the offer not only highlighted the absurdity of the proposal but also emphasized the nuances in international diplomacy.

Panama: Revisiting the Canal's Legacy

The Panama Canal, a marvel of engineering, stands as a poignant symbol of American imperialism. Constructed in the early 20th century, the canal was a strategic asset that significantly cut travel time for maritime trade, serving as a vital artery for global commerce. Trump's retrospective gaze at Panama's history embodies a complex reflection on American intervention and its implications for sovereignty.

During Trump's presidency, discussions of reopening negotiations regarding control and access to the canal reignited memories of past imperial ambitions, echoing a desire to reassert influence over historical territories. Recent economic shifts and trade routes have created conversations around re-evaluating Panama's role, reminiscent of a chess game where each move must be calculated meticulously. Yet, the sovereignty of Panama remains critical to its identity, contrasting with Trump's imperial visions.

The Role of Nationalism in Trump's Imperial Agenda

Nationalism

surged during Trump's presidency

, acting as a unifying force for his supporters, similar to a roaring fire that draws people closer. Trump's appeal to nationalism fused with his imperial ambitions, providing a narrative that prioritized the needs of Americans over global responsibilities. This rhetorical shift significantly altered the public's perception of American identity on the world stage.

Through a series of speeches and policies, Trump painted a picture of a world where the U.S. would no longer be a passive player but an active participant in shaping the global landscape. This manifested in a rejection of international agreements and forums that were perceived as undermining American sovereignty. As he championed this brand of nationalism, questions regarding the

ethical implications of imperialism

rose to the forefront of political discourse, with many advocating for a reexamination of America's global role.

Public Perception: How Americans View Trump's Imperialism

Public perception of Trump's imperialistic tendencies has been polarizing, reflecting a divided American society. A survey conducted by Pew Research Center in 2020 indicated that approximately 66% of Americans disapproved of Trump's foreign policy overall, suggesting a wariness towards his approach. This ambivalence captures the essence of a nation grappling with its historical identity while trying to navigate modern complexities.

Supporters often regarded his policies as a necessary deviation from past administrations, believing that a more assertive America would recapture global respect. In contrast, critics warned of the dangers inherent in

disregarding multilateralism

, fearing that Trump's imperial instincts could lead to isolationism and weaken democratic norms. The debate surrounding these principles represents an ongoing struggle to balance national interests with global responsibilities.

The Impact of Trump's Vision on North American Relations

Trump’s vision fundamentally altered North American relations, introducing a level of unpredictability that reshaped diplomatic conversations. His approach to foreign policy emphasized bilateral relationships, signaling a departure from traditional multilateral frameworks. The turbulence surrounding NAFTA renegotiations and trade deals illustrated this shift, bringing to light the fragility of established ties.


As North America pivoted towards a more transactional framework, pressures mounted on Canada and Mexico to align closely with American objectives. The resulting USMCA not only aimed to secure better terms for the U.S. but also underscored the complexity of regional interdependence. The ripple effects of Trump's policies will likely be felt for years to come, painting a landscape marked by uncertainty and potential conflict.


Join the Conversation at BreakingRanksBlog


As we navigate the complexities of Trump's legacy and its implications for North American relations and beyond, the importance of staying informed and engaged cannot be overstated. BreakingRanksBlog is dedicated to providing insightful analysis on social justice and political issues that affect Americans, from voter suppression to mental health care for veterans and African Americans. To continue exploring these critical topics and to join a community committed to making a difference, we invite you to

Check Out More Articles

on our platform. Your voice matters in the ongoing dialogue for change and understanding.

0 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

I write...

Comments


bottom of page