top of page

Is there a crisis between church and state? From the Ten Commandments to Chaplains in Schools

The connection between the church and state has long been a subject of debate and legal battles throughout history. Our society has grappled with the balance between freedom and a secular government. I am deeply intrigued by this issue, and thus I thoroughly researched the background of this relationship to explore the conflicts surrounding religious practices in public institutions. I briefly studied religions as part of my humanities studies while attending college.

Additionally, I analyzed recent court cases that have significantly impacted the dynamic between church and state. I also look at the relevance of the Ten Commandments in today’s world. I recommend a review of the laws regarding chaplains in schools in Florida and Texas. Last, it offers guidance on navigating the intersection of religion and government.

Exploring the Historical Bond Between Church and State

To comprehend today’s challenges with church-state relations, it’s essential to trace to their origins. From civilizations like Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia to societies such as ancient Athens and the Roman Republic, religion has played a significant role in governance systems. The belief system often regarded rulers as intermediaries between beliefs and earthly affairs.

Throughout history, the dynamics between institutions and governing bodies have undergone shifts as societies progressed.

In the days of the United States, the Founding Fathers faced the challenge of structuring a government that respected liberties and imposing no specific religion. The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, established in 1791, explicitly prohibits Congress from endorsing any religion or restricting individuals’ freedom to practice their faith. This fundamental principle has been at the center of disputes that have influenced the relationship between church and state.

Over time, the interaction between organizations and governmental authorities has been intricate and occasionally contentious. In Europe, for instance, the Catholic Church held sway over both spiritual and worldly matters. Monarchs and leaders often sought validation from the Church to legitimize their rule, while the Church leveraged its influence to shape decisions. This fusion of political power resulted in a mix of collaboration and conflict between these two spheres. There is so much more to unpack in this study area.

The Enlightenment era in 18th century Europe ushered in perspectives on individual rights and governance. Thinkers like John Locke and Montesquieu championed for a separation between religion and government to prevent oppression and safeguard people’s freedom of belief.

The concepts presented here formed the basis for the governance that later influenced the development of democratic societies.

Legal Disputes Regarding the Division Between Religion and State

Ongoing disputes have arisen since the ratification of the First Amendment, with individuals continuously testing the limits of the separation between religion and state. Key cases like Everson v. Board of Education (1947), Engel v. Vitale (1962) and Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) have established the guidelines for integrating practices into institutions.

A fundamental idea underpinning these battles is secularism. While some argue for a division between religion and state to uphold impartiality, others support freedom that permits religious symbols and practices in public spaces. The Supreme Court has played a role in finding a balance between these differing viewpoints shaping today’s relationship between church and state.

Everson v. Board of Education (1947) was a case that tackled the constitutionality of using funds to transport students to religious schools. In a 5 4 ruling, the Supreme Court determined that this practice did not violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, establishing a precedent for cases concerning the separation of religion and state.

The Engel v. Vitale case in 1962 revolved around the recitation of a state written prayer in schools leading to the Supreme Court ruling it unconstitutional. This decision underscored the importance of maintaining an environment in institutions to honor the diverse religious beliefs of students and uphold religious freedom principles.

Dealing with Controversies Related to Religious Practices in Public Settings

Discussions surrounding practices in institutions have ignited ongoing debates. The key point of these discussions is determining the level of allowance for religious expressions in different spaces. Both individual and institutional, constitutional rights are impacted by cases involving prayers in schools or the display of symbols on grounds.

At the center of this debate, duplicity is critical to acknowledge. To illustrate, a woman, last year, accused Christian Ziegler, the chairperson of the Florida Republican Party, of engaging in a consensual sexual encounter with him and his wife, Bridget.

One of the co-founders of Moms for Liberty, a conservative group, is Bridget Ziegler, the wife of Mr. Ziegler. Their organization has been actively involved in advocating for the removal of LGBTQ-related educational materials from public schools.

Yes, she did that!

Understandingly, the GOP spearheading the Ten Commandments inclusion in certain areas is a topic that sparks disagreement and hypocritical head-shaking. Supporters claim that these long-standing principles provide valuable guidance for society, while opponents argue they contradict the principle of separating church and state.

But not all GOP members follow or abide by the Ten Commandments. For instance, their presidential nominee and convicted felon, Donald Trump, was civilly liable for sexual abuse of E. Jean Carrol. Trump stands accused of allegedsexual misconduct by an alleged 20 women to include an affair with Stormy Daniels, an adult film actress. Also, there are sketchy reports from old and new Jeffrey Epstein unsealed documents.

Sidebar: Does anyone remember Alex Acosta?

It is crucial to examine the significance of the Ten Commandments and their alignment with our constitutional rights as we address this issue. Consider if the GOP and red state governor’s push for more euro-centric christian values upon education systems, when do we openly debate the prospect of indoctrination and where do we draw the line? Or is there even a line?

Besides discussing practices, conversations within institutions go beyond the scope of the Ten Commandments.

The debate over the recitation of prayers in settings, such as school ceremonies or government gatherings, remains an issue. Proponents argue that prayer promotes unity and tradition, while opponents claim it may alienate those with other beliefs or no faith. This ongoing conversation underscores the need to balance freedoms with inclusivity in public spaces.

Furthermore, the discussion surrounding symbols in various regions extends beyond Christianity and includes symbols from a range of faith traditions, such as the Star of David, crescent moon and star, or the Om symbol. These symbols ignite conversations about the representation of different religions and the promotion of diversity.

Those who support inclusivity argue that exhibiting a wide range of symbols is a true reflection of society’s composition, while skeptics may raise concerns about potential biases or the watering down of religious significance. To effectively handle the complexities that symbols pose in institutions, it is necessary to have a complete understanding of their historical significance and present-day relevance. Therefore, education is key.

Recent legal cases have significantly altered the connection between church and state. Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission (2018) stands out as a notable case in which the Supreme Court had to navigate the delicate balance between freedom and discrimination laws.

The recent legal cases triggered a discussion on balancing accommodations with LGBTQ+ rights protection.

The case of Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue (2020) addressed the matter of state funding for schools. The Supreme Court’s ruling to support these schools has sparked worries regarding the allocation of funds for educational purposes.

These legal decisions illustrate the changing relationship between religion and government, underscoring the importance of reassessment and adaptation in response to challenges.

Exploring the Role of the Ten Commandments in Today’s Society

Contemplating the ongoing debates about the connection between the church and the state, a melancholic heaviness fills the air, urging a deep evaluation of the Ten Commandments’ significance in modern society. This is partly the reason I wrote this article because of community concern and the national debate; I wanted to weigh-in on the issue.

Some people view them as unchanging ideals, but others fear they represent a religious stance that could exclude and divide in a world that should be accepting and diverse. Having the 10 Commandments on display in your home is a way to outwardly demonstrate your personal devotion. On the flip side, presenting it in public spaces other than an individual’s home or place of worship raises a separate question.

Research shows that many Americans hold a reverence for the Ten Commandments. According to a survey by the Pew Research Center, 72% of Americans consider these commandments either integral to their faith or as a compass.

In the discussion, it’s crucial to find a ground that respects both the personal beliefs of individuals and the rights of those, with differing viewpoints.

Legislation Regarding Chaplains in Schools in Florida and Texas

Full Disclosure: I am a Florida resident and did not vote for Gov Desantis, so there is some bias.

Florida and Texas have recently passed laws that allow chaplains to be present in schools. These laws aim to address students’ spiritual needs while also maintaining a separation between church and state.

In 2017, Florida enacted the “Florida Student and Faculty Religious Liberties Act,” which permits students to express their beliefs in schools through voluntary prayer, religious gatherings, and the use of religious symbols and attire. The law also allows for chaplains to offer guidance and counseling to students.

Florida passed the school chaplain bill, also known as HB 931, in 2024. This bill allows for chaplains in schools, providing spiritual guidance and support to students. It aims to promote the well-being and holistic development of students, acknowledging the importance of faith-based resources in educational environments. However, like many of Florida Gov. Desantis bills, HB 931 is heavy on Euro Christian rhetoric and “Handmaiden Tale” overtones while being light on addressing “volunteer” chaplains of diverse religions that faiths call for leaving one’s faith to belong to theirs or as to religious rites and rituals -animal sacrifices?

Similarly, in 2019 Texas passed the “Chaplains, in Schools Bill “, which enables public school districts to hire chaplains who can provide support to students and staff members.

We emphasize the significance of chaplain services, with a focus on their role in respecting students’ religious rights and avoiding the promotion of any specific beliefs. Also, there are requirements for parent involvement.

Following its passage in the Texas Senate this year (2024), Senate Bill the Texas House approved 763 in an 84-60 vote. Using safety funds, Texas schools now can hire unlicensed chaplains in mental health roles. Furthermore, schools will now be open to volunteer chaplains.

My Tips for Handling the Relationship Between Religion and Government

I am skeptical by intersection between government, religion, and individual rights and freedoms. Although we live in a democracy today, there is a silent chipping away of hard earned human rights by many GOP government led states.

Their explicit goal is to organize and fund this effort in order to normalize voter suppression, gerrymandering, and revisionist history. If a lone woodsman deep in the forest quietly chops away at large historical trees, does anyone care? But what if he is chopping down the very pillars that uphold the freedoms we all enjoy today, like a tree falling and shattering the foundation of our democracy? Does it matter then?

Dealing with the relationship between religion and government involves thought and respect for beliefs. Here are some suggestions for finding ground and fostering a church state dynamic.

1. Enhancing Awareness

Encourage learning about religious customs to promote understanding and mutual respect.

Encouraging learning about religious customs is essential to promote understanding and mutual respect among different communities.

By educating ourselves about the beliefs, practices, and traditions of various religions, we can gain a deeper appreciation for the diversity that exists in our world.

This knowledge helps to collapse stereotypes, reduce prejudice, and foster empathy towards others’ religious perspectives. Ultimately, promoting understanding and mutual respect leads to a more harmonious and inclusive society.

2. Implementing policies

Develop policies that respect religious perspectives while maintaining the secular nature of government institutions. One way to develop policies that respect religious perspectives while maintaining the secular nature of government institutions is to protect religious freedom while avoiding the establishment of any religion as the official state religion.

The government can enact policies to protect religious freedom, like allowing the display of religious symbols in public spaces favoring no religion.

Government institutions can accommodate religious practices without infringing on others’ rights or burdening the government.

Policymakers can develop policies that promote inclusivity, equality, and religious freedom for all citizens by balancing, respecting religious perspectives, and upholding the secular nature of government institutions.

3. Encouraging Dialogue

Promoting discussions between faith communities and government representatives is crucial for fostering understanding, cooperation, and effective policymaking.

These discussions provide an opportunity for faith communities to voice their concerns, share their unique perspectives, and contribute to the decision-making process. “Souls to the Polls” is an endeavor to engage communities to take part in voting.

By engaging in dialogue, both parties can develop a better understanding of each other’s values, needs, and priorities, leading to more inclusive and fair policies that consider the diverse religious landscape of the community.

4. Seeking Advice

Consult experts to ensure that policies align with constitutional principles safeguarding the rights of all individuals.

When planning laws on freedom of speech, consulting constitutional law experts is essential to ensure policies align with protecting the right to express opinions and ideas without censorship or government interference.

These experts can offer insights into constitutional principles and can help draft balanced policies that affect your community and marginalized communities that are all too often excluded and neglected. Many city planning commissions have authored state highways through minority neighborhoods to cut them off from growth and commerce opportunities. It is not an accident that black neighborhoods have highway underpasses and large swaths of commercial super highways dispensing pollution and exhaust fumes from heavy commercial trucks ferrying many cargo types and high-volume vehicle traffic.

By consulting with experts, policymakers can ensure that the policies they enact are not only legally sound but also uphold the fundamental rights and liberties of all individuals to ensure safety and environmentally healthy communities.

5. Continuously Adapting

Acknowledge changes by regularly reviewing and researching religious practices to align with evolving demographics and norms.

For example, a religious organization may acknowledge the changing demographics and norms by regularly reviewing and researching the practices related to gender equality.

They may recognize the importance of inclusivity and equality within their community and actively seek ways to align their religious practices with these evolving values.

This could involve revisiting traditional rituals or customs that may have been exclusive or discriminatory towards certain genders and changing or reinterpret them to be more inclusive and respectful of diverse identities.

By staying informed and open to change, the religious organization can ensure that their practices are relevant and meaningful to all members of their community, regardless of their gender. The student or teacher wearing a hijab is not a threat, like an individual wearing tribal garments, dashiki, or Kippah.

“In the realm of respect, embracing religious tolerance and valuing human sanctity are the highest forms of reverence.” Writer

These strategies enable us to progress in upholding freedom principles while also acknowledging the importance of a functional governmental system.

Where Do I stand on Church and State?

I contend that the separation of church and state is a crucial principle in a democratic society, and public schools should adhere to it. Mixing religion with public education can lead to a violation of the rights of students and families who do not practice the same faith or have different beliefs.

Mixing religion with public education can lead to favoring certain religious groups over others, thus undermining the principle of religious freedom. Additionally, co-mingling church and state in public schools can blur the lines between education and indoctrination, compromising the aim and unbiased nature of education.


In summary, addressing the church state dilemma in our society requires examination and thoughtful consideration.

By examining legal disputes and controversies surrounding practices in public settings, as well as recent legal battles, we can better understand the importance of Ten Commandments regulations concerning school chaplains. Additionally, by exploring different approaches to navigating the intersection of religion and government, we can gain a deeper comprehension of the complexities involved.

It is through conversations, education, and flexibility that we can strive towards a society where religious liberty and secular principles of governance can coexist harmoniously.

Engage in Discussions at BreakingRanks

The relationship between religion and government has wider consequences than just legal structures. It affects marginalized communities. BreakingRanksBlog focuses on shedding light on issues affecting these communities, such as voter suppression, misinformation during elections, police violence, and health challenges. We encourage you to explore our blog articles, subscribe for notifications, and take part in conversations.

Advocating for justice and equality for all requires your voice to be heard.

0 views0 comments


bottom of page